In india, the executive power of the union is vested in the president of india, but he is obliged to exercise it on the aid and advice of his council of ministers the president's satisfaction is therefore nothing but the satisfaction of his council of ministers in whom the real executive power resides.
This entry about a k kraipak & ors v union of india & ors (2) has been published under the terms of the creative commons attribution 30 (cc by 30) licence, which permits unrestricted use and reproduction, provided the author or authors of the a k kraipak & ors v union of india & ors (2) entry and the encyclopedia of law are in each case credited as the source of the a k kraipak & ors v union of india & ors (2) entry. Union of india and another(2) therein the court repelled the contention that the proceedings of a departmental promotion committee were vitiated as one of the members of that committee was favourably disposed towards one of the selected candidates.
It is a site to share short notes on law for judicial exam in india you can comment on any post, ask for judgment on any topic and free to ask any question related to judicial exam.
Union of india statement of facts in 1966, a service called the indian forest service was constituted, the selection for which was to be made from among the officers serving in the forest department of the state.
But as per the supreme court of india, this was strong evidence to show that the constituent assembly did not desire to introduce into india the concept of procedural due process which was done mainly to avoid the uncertainty surrounding the due process concept in the usa.
Kraipak vs union of india is regarded as an epoch making decision as it demolishes the artificial and conceptualistic distinction between administrative and quasi judicial function as well as delinked natural justice from quasi judicial.